Scarlett Johansson Reacts to OpenAI Voice Controversy: “Shocked and Angered”
In May, Scarlett Johansson expressed her “shock” and “anger” over claims that OpenAI had allegedly recreated her voice without permission for their new ChatGPT system. Johansson, known for her distinctive voice and strong stance on privacy, was vocal about her disapproval, stating that such actions undermine the rights and privacy of individuals.
The controversy erupted when reports surfaced that the AI system had included a simulation of Johansson’s voice in its responses. Johansson was quick to condemn the use, emphasizing the importance of consent and the potential dangers of unauthorized voice replication. “I was shocked and angered,” she said. “This not only violates my personal rights but also sets a dangerous precedent for the misuse of AI technology.”
Sam Altman, OpenAI’s chief executive, responded to the allegations by denying that Johansson’s voice was intentionally replicated. He explained that the voice simulation in question was not explicitly designed to mimic Johansson’s voice. However, acknowledging the concerns raised, Altman decided to pause the deployment of the system. He stated, “While we did not recreate Ms. Johansson’s voice, we understand the serious implications and are taking steps to review and address the situation thoroughly.”
The incident has sparked a broader debate about the ethical use of AI and the need for stringent regulations to protect individuals from unauthorized replication of their likenesses. Johansson’s stance highlights the growing concern among celebrities and the public about the potential misuse of AI technologies and the importance of establishing clear guidelines to prevent such issues in the future.
The pause in the system’s deployment indicates OpenAI’s willingness to engage in discussions about responsible AI development and the necessity of obtaining explicit consent before using someone’s voice or likeness in any form. As the AI industry continues to evolve, this controversy underscores the critical need for balancing innovation with respect for personal rights and ethical standards.