Elisha Abbo, a senator from Adamawa North, has lately made headlines by threatening to pursue legal action against Wange David. This is in reaction to Wange David’s allegations that the two of them were involved in the production of sex videos together.
David said in a recent interview that she had filmed 32 sex films with Abbo. He made this accusation that she had done so. In addition to this, he asserted that Abbo was the sole individual who had access to the film, claiming that he was the one who uploaded it to the internet.
Nevertheless, Abbo has refuted the allegations that have been made against him. In addition, his legal representative, Odiyowvi Osusu, has issued a formal rebuttal to David’s claims. In it, he asserts that David’s statements have not only caused major damage to Abbo’s personal and professional reputation, but they have also misled the general public about the situation.
According to the letter, the video in question was uploaded to the “Naija Police: U” platform on September 4, 2024. The following day, TrustTV News broadcast an interview on YouTube from the same platform. September 4 was the day that each of these occurrences took place.
Osusu has ordered that David provide a public apology and retract his prior comments within the next three days. He has also demanded that David retract his statement. It is needed that this retraction not only be shown on national television but also published in three major newspapers. The conditions of this retraction are subject to clearance by Abbo’s legal team, and it is also required that it be shown on national television. To add insult to injury, the retraction ought to be disseminated on the same platforms that were utilised for the first publishing of the article.
In the event that you fail to comply within the specified time frame, you will be subject to legal action that seeks damages for libel, an injunction to prevent subsequent publications, as well as a retraction and public apology that is required by the court.
The purpose of this letter is to serve as a warning that David will be subject to legal action in the event that he does not submit a response that is both satisfactory and timely.